Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:06

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Raw Milk Is Trending — Here's Why Doctors Are Seriously Concerned - BuzzFeed
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
We’re About To Talk To Dolphins… But Are We Ready To Hear The Truth? - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Aut perferendis voluptatibus eum sapiente officiis est explicabo itaque.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Corbin Carroll Diagnosed With Wrist Fracture - MLB Trade Rumors
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Google Is Now Rolling Out AI Mode In The US - Search Engine Roundtable